The Mental Militia Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Free Movie!  (Read 2673 times)

Elias Alias

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4918
  • TMM
Free Movie!
« on: June 15, 2005, 11:44:19 pm »

I've got more than twenty conspiracy theory films here at my hide-out, some of which are extremely valuable resources, and this one film by Jimmy Walter ranks right up there at the top of my list. I feel that this film (3hrs) is at least as important as Dave von Kleist's "911 In Plane Site". It is the video coverage of the "Confronting The Evidence" convention held last September 11, 2004 in New York City. This one is as real as it gets, and I personally recommend it. The panels are packed with research specialists in various fields, including Webster Tarpley and others.

For readers who like to push the envelope in their paranoia, here is the cutting edge production on governmental involvement in 911, and far out, it's free! Tell your friends, eh? :)

Happy trails,
"Heirs to self-knowledge shed gently their fears..."


  • aka Elf-Boy
  • Member
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1683
Free Movie!
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2005, 03:22:24 pm »

I can't say I put much stock in the theory that the Feds planned and executed 9/11, but I'll download the movie segments and take a look.
And Tomlinson took up the tale and spoke of his good in life.
"O this I have read in a book," he said, "and that was told to me,
"And this I have thought that another man thought of a Prince in Muscovy."
The good souls flocked like homing doves and bade him clear the path,
And Peter twirled the jangling Keys in weariness and wrath.
"Ye have read, ye have heard, ye have thought," he said, "and the tale is yet to run:
"By the worth of the body that once ye had, give answer—what ha' ye done?"


  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4920
  • Keeper of the red button
Free Movie!
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2005, 03:53:02 pm »

Jimmy Walter ranks right up there
I love that guy -- dynomite!!
O Lord,
Thine Ocean is so great,
And my boat is so small.

Sportos, motorheads, dweebies, wastoids...they think he's a righteous dude.

The utter waste of our $2,000,000,000 a day military-industrial machine was never demonstrated more vividly than on 9/11.

You do what works.


  • Four-Leaf Order of PSM
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6944
Free Movie!
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2005, 02:08:34 am »

Jimmy Walter ranks right up there
I love that guy -- dynomite!!
Here, try these on.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2005, 02:09:59 am by RagnarDanneskjold »
The Mayor is the Problem
The flagpole is the answer
We hung the first one
We can hang another one

The Firesign Theatre - from the album Boom Dot Bust

Dear Government
You are a ass shit.

A note from my younger son when he was 3.

When rights are outlawed, only outlaws will have rights. - Me

Round up everybody who can ride a horse or pull a trigger. Let's break out some Winchesters.  - John Wayne (Chisum)

Elias Alias

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4918
  • TMM
Free Movie!
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2005, 03:59:30 am »

:huh:   ;)   :lol:   :P   :)   :unsure:   :blink: EVERYTHING I KNOW   :angry:   :o   :(   <_<  IS WRONG!    :ph34r:

To prove it, here are my notes for my talk to a class


Presentation for Dr. Dave Schrupp, Department of Political Science, Montana State University

The following is to be a presentation to Dr. Schrupp's class at MSU on June 21, 2005


Secrecy In Statecraft: A Look Into Some Events In The Life Of Allen  Dulles

(Introductory ad lib comments – smiles and relaxation, and concept of Freedom Outlaws)

I would like to begin this morning with a brief quotation from the American Historical Association, as found at this page on their Internet website:

There, we read:
“How the State asserts its authority in foreign affairs has been described by Stanley Hoffmann in a passage that emphasizes the degree to which its sphere of action is composed not of determinable but of uncertain factors that it is the duty of statecraft to assess, shape, and exploit. Statecraft, Hoffmann has claimed,
'emanates from a milieu—the domestic society—whose values, political and social institutions, experiences, and patterns of authority are never entirely fixed or coherent, never point only in one direction, and, while ruling out certain choices, leave a considerable margin for maneuver ...; and statecraft operates in a milieu—the international system—that has repeatedly been defined as an arena for competition for multiple stakes, with uncertain rules which the players ... hammer out by trial and error, and characterized by moves which, however cleverly calculated, are more like wagers than rational adaptations of means to ends.'”

(Hoffmann, Gulliver’s Troubles: or, The Setting of American Foreign Policy (New York, 1968), xvi.)

As we note Mr. Hoffmann's observation that 'statecraft' emanates within the system of a (any) domestic society and comes to operate within what is called an 'international system', we approach also a phenomenon known as “Policy”. There is Domestic Policy, and there is Foreign Policy. I am supposing that Foreign Policy is derived from Domestic Policy, which itself must derive from the interacting and originating Personal Policy of as many individuals as may exist and/or compete within the domestic totality.

Competitors within a society may be called “Players”, and this morning I would like to see the world through the life and deedery of one very active and involved Player named Allen Dulles. To begin, let us go a way back into history and note that a handful of radical malcontents had taken a disliking for the King of England's “Policy”. Their consensus opinions, shared and enhanced by the pooling of their interacting perceptions, led to the American Revolution which we commemorate each Fourth of July as “Independence Day”.

What these Players did was quite illegal, and the authority of the Throne sought to control them by the employment of what we today would call  “law enforcement”. Warrants were issued for the arrest of some of those Players. Other law-abiding Players who were content to prosper under the authority of the Throne and its Policy included traditional British Tory perceptions, and some of the New England families of the Tory persuasion had long held business relations with the mother country, England.

To such families, the band of malcontents threatened their secure and profitable relations with England, and from the logical motives derived thereby what we today call the “Loyalist” opponents to the Revolution. Many Tory families, which I like to call “Houses”, resisted the revolution, snitched-off the troop movements of Washington's army, aided the British soldiers, and in general tried to assist the Throne in maintaining its authority over its Colonies. The prevalent view of the day was that England owned the Colonies, which were therefore legally subject to the Throne's “foreign policy”, or we may say, “distant domestic policy”.

But perhaps any Policy is dependent upon, among other factors, the 'power' to govern the subjects of said Policy and to overcome any opponents to said Policy. The power of governance may be seen to be dependent upon a hierarchy of authority, so let us think about authority for a moment. The way I see it, hierarchy is the way in which power is distributed outwardly to all Players of the realm. We read in a book by Joel Kramer and Diana Alstad, entitled “The Guru Papers”, this accounting of it - “Hierarchy is a way of structuring power;  authority is a way of exercising power; and ultimately morality is the way authority is justified.” (p.14)

Whether the Throne knew it or not, the British Policy consisted of what Stanley Hoffman, in the quotation above, called “Statecraft” as perceived and employed in the governance of the individuals who comprised the populations of the Colonies in North America. Statecraft. As Mr. Hoffman notes, Statecraft emanates from domestic society and operates in the international community as “Policy”.

Now let us look at the back of our one-dollar Federal Reserve Note (FRN). There we find the Great Seal of the United States. I would like to ask you to note carefully that the words on that Great Seal do not say: “The Great Seal of the United States of America”, but state instead: “The Great Seal of the United States”. In reality as we look at that seal on the back of our one-dollar bill, the words “of America” are, whether deliberately or not,  missing. The first thing which comes to my attention is that the membership roster of the United Nations is said to comprise itself of all member “nation-states”, a term which is commonly used everywhere. We used to speak of “Countries”, but now we refer to Countries as “nation-states”. In looking at it this way, we realize that the Great Seal of the United States may as well symbolize the membership of all member nations on the roster of the United Nations.

Further examination of that seal reveals the Illuminati's old symbol of the “All Seeing Eye” which is atop an unfinished pyramid. The pyramid is, among many other things, a symbol of an hypothetical “hierarchy”. The power of illumination sits logically atop the pyramid, and dispenses outwardly and downwardly the authority of the realm symbolized, indicating the relationship between any leader and the led.

One of the blessings of being an American is the option to decline being “led”. Self-ownership and personal responsibility go hand in hand for such people who refuse to be “led”. Such people often become unwitting leaders, as attested by the revolutionary spirit of Thomas Jefferson and George Washington and Benjamin Franklin and Samuel Adams and etc., by virtue of their intrinsic distaste for being “followers”. That distaste for following-the-leader, while producing America, has become our birthright and heritage, if we wish to claim it. This is one of the principles which I value as an American – the principle of self-ownership.

What brought about this spirit of self-determination and self-ownership, or, what contributed to it in part,  has to do with the good King's “Policy” regarding taxation of the individuals of his Colonies, as we learn from Benjamin Franklin, who stated that had the Throne not sought to finance its British Empire at the expense of the Colonists, there would likely have been no rebellion. Apparently the King sat upon his Throne far away in England and listened more to his bean-counters than to the voice of protest arriving from across the Atlantic Ocean, and his frugal “authority” proved to be taxing upon the Colonists in ways which engendered discontent and as it grew, finally, malcontent.

I would like to note for you now that at that time there was operating in many places around the world an entity known as the “British East India Company”, which is the first source of which I'm aware for the phrase  “free trade”. The British East India Company had the blessing of the Throne and the Throne's military – and combining thusly the principles of unbridled capitalism with military might served England by providing a viable hierarchy now called  “The British Empire”.

The British East India Company was international commerce in action. In addition to “normal” trade, however, British ships also transported African slaves to this continent, first pausing to inventory and sort the slaves at slave camps in the Caribbean, from where they would be assigned destinations ashore.
Additionally, the ships of the British Empire had been involving themselves in another free-trade fiasco which led to what history calls “The Opium Wars” of the mid-1800s.

These commercial enterprises were not only condoned by the Throne; they were proactively sought and defended by the Throne. The reason that the British Empire smuggled shiploads of opium into China had to do with a trade-imbalance owing to China's refusal to buy British-made goods while insisting on payment by Britain in the form of silver for Chinese tea and silk, which the British people and Europe consumed rapidly. The silver was draining from the Throne's coffers into China, and nothing was coming back. Hence The Bank of England's recommendation to the Throne for smuggling opium in massive quantities into China, which would be paid for by silver. Problem solved.

Until, that is, the year 1800 when China requested that all British ship captains sign a bond swearing to not offload opium into China.  The Throne refused to honor that request, which had been made by a Chinese government which had noticed the social and cultural effects of opium addiction within its population. Instead, the British employed several New England Tory Houses with shipping businesses to run the opium into China under the American flag.

By this time, the Colonies had succeeded in their Revolution and had formed the Federal government of the United States of America, and the new nation was in its infancy. But the Tory loyalist families had sworn to upset the American Revolution and return the United States to British rule, and the Throne favored such families with lucrative shipping contracts to deal the opium into China for British banking interests. An example of Tory loyalist sentiment is seen in the Tory proclamation regarding Thomas Jefferson's first inauguration speech, which they claimed to be “radical usurpation”.

Here is some history regarding the arrangement between England and the New England Tory families who had been “British loyalists” during George Washington's Revolution. This history is not generally taught in the public schools. The following is from a book by Anton Chaitkin and Webster Tarpley entitled “George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography”, which is available online for free downloading and printing.


Skull and Bones--the Russell Trust Association--was first established among the class graduating from Yale in 1833. Its founder was William Huntington Russell of Middletown, Connecticut. The Russell family was the master of incalculable wealth derived from the largest U.S. criminal organization of the nineteenth century: Russell and Company, the great opium syndicate.

There was at that time a deep suspicion of, and national revulsion against, freemasonry and secret organizations in the United States, fostered in particular by the anti-masonic writings of former U.S. President John Quincy Adams. Adams stressed that those who take oaths to politically powerful international secret societies cannot be depended on for loyalty to a democratic republic.

But the Russells were protected as part of the multiply-intermarried grouping of families then ruling Connecticut (see accompanying chart). The blood-proud members of the Russell, Pierpont, Edwards, Burr, Griswold, Day, Alsop and Hubbard families were prominent in the pro- British party within the state. Many of their sons would be among the members chosen for the Skull and Bones Society over the years.

The background to Skull and Bones is a story of Opium and Empire, and a bitter struggle for political control over the new U.S. republic.

Samuel Russell, second cousin to Bones founder William H., established Russell and Company in 1823. Its business was to acquire opium from Turkey and smuggle it into China, where it was strictly prohibited, under the armed protection of the British Empire.

The prior, predominant American gang in this field had been the syndicate created by Thomas Handasyd Perkins of Newburyport, Massachusetts, an aggregation of the self-styled ``blue bloods'' or Brahmins of Boston's north shore. Forced out of the lucrative African slave trade by U.S. law and Caribbean slave revolts, leaders of the Cabot, Lowell, Higginson, Forbes, Cushing and Sturgis families had married Perkins siblings and children. The Perkins opium syndicate made the fortune and established the power of these families. By the 1830s, the Russells had bought out the Perkins syndicate and made Connecticut the primary center of the U.S. opium racket. Massachusetts families (Coolidge, Sturgis, Forbes and Delano) joined Connecticut (Alsop) and New York (Low) smuggler-millionaires under the Russell auspices.

** Certain of the prominent Boston opium families, such as Cabot and Weld, did not affiliate directly with Russell, Connecticut and Yale, but were identified instead with Harvard.

John Quincy Adams and other patriots had fought these men for a quarter century by the time the Russell Trust Association was set up with its open pirate emblem--Skull and Bones.

With British ties of family, shipping and merchant banking, the old New England Tories had continued their hostility to American independence after the Revolutionary War of 1775-83. These pretended conservative patriots proclaimed Thomas Jefferson's 1801 presidential inauguration ``radical usurpation.''

The Massachusetts Tories (``Essex Junto'') joined with Vice President Aaron Burr, Jr. (a member of the Connecticut Edwards and Pierpont families) and Burr's cousin and law partner Theodore Dwight, in political moves designed to break up the United States and return it to British allegiance.

The U.S. nationalist leader, former Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, exposed the plan in 1804. Burr shot him to death in a duel, then led a famous abortive conspiracy to form a new empire in the Southwest, with territory to be torn from the U.S.A. and Spanish Mexico. For the ``blue bloods,'' the romantic figure of Aaron Burr was ever afterwards the symbol of British feudal revenge against the American republic.

The Connecticut Tory families hosted the infamous Hartford Convention in 1815, toward the end of the second war between the U.S. and Britain (the War of 1812). Their secessionist propaganda was rendered impotent by America's defensive military victory. This faction then retired from the open political arena, pursuing instead entirely private and covert alliances with the British Empire. The incestuously intermarried Massachusetts and Connecticut families associated themselves with the British East India Company in the criminal opium traffic into China. These families made increased profits as partners and surrogates for the British during the bloody 1839-42 Opium War, the race war of British forces against Chinese defenders. (snip)

The following gentlemen were among Russells' partners:

Augustine Heard (1785-1868): ship captain and pioneer U.S. opium smuggler.
John Cleve Green (1800-75): married to Sarah Griswold; gave a fortune in opium profits to Princeton University, financing three Princeton buildings and four professorships; trustee of the Princeton Theological Seminary for 25 years.
Abiel Abbott Low (1811-93): his opium fortune financed the construction of the Columbia University New York City campus; father of Columbia's president Seth Low.
John Murray Forbes (1813-98): his opium millions financed the career of author Ralph Waldo Emerson, who married Forbes's daughter, and bankrolled the establishment of the Bell Telephone Company, whose first president was Forbes's son.
Joseph Coolidge: his Augustine Heard agency got $10 million yearly as surrogates for the Scottish dope-runners Jardine Matheson during the fighting in China; his son organized the United Fruit Company; his grandson, Archibald Cary Coolidge, was the founding executive officer of the Anglo-Americans' Council on Foreign Relations.
Warren Delano, Jr.: chief of Russell and Co. in Canton; grandfather of U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Russell Sturgis: his grandson by the same name was chairman of the Baring Bank in England, financiers of the Far East opium trade.

Such persons as John C. Green and A.A. Low, whose names adorn various buildings at Princeton and Columbia Universities, made little attempt to hide the criminal origin of their influential money. Similarly with the Cabots, the Higginsons and the Welds for Harvard. The secret groups at other colleges are analogous and closely related to Yale's Skull and Bones.

Princeton has its ``eating clubs,'' especially Ivy Club and Cottage Club, whose oligarchical tradition runs from Jonathan Edwards and Aaron Burr through the Dulles brothers. At Harvard there is the ultra-blue-blooded Porcelian (known also as the Porc or Pig club); Theodore Roosevelt bragged to the German Kaiser of his membership there; Franklin Roosevelt was a member of the slightly ``lower'' Fly Club. (snip)

Yale was the northern college favored by southern slaveowning would-be aristocrats. Among Yale's southern students were John C. Calhoun, later the famous South Carolina defender of slavery against nationalism, and Judah P. Benjamin, later Secretary of State for the slaveowners' Confederacy.

Young South Carolinian Joseph Heatly Dulles, whose family bought their slaves with the money from contract-security work for the British conquerors in India, was in a previous secret Yale group, the ``Society of Brothers in Unity.'' At Yale Dulles worked with the Northern secessionists and attached himself to Daniel Lord; their two families clove together in the fashion of a gang. The Lords became powerful Anglo-American Wall Street lawyers, and J.H. Dulles's grandson was the father of Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles.

End excerpts from “George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography” by Anton Chaitkin and Webster G. Tarpley.


I would like to make two points before continuing. The British opium-smuggling operations were centered originally at Canton and Shanghai, China. Once the opium had been shipped into those two cities, it required an internal network for distribution into the heartland of China. This network of distribution began the organized criminal syndicate which would much later furnish Chiang Kai-shek with funding for his military, which in turn was used to protect the smuggling syndicate's operations throughout much of China. This oppression resulted in a brutality which drove the Chinese population into the arms of Chairman Mao in 1947. If time permits, I will speak on Charlie Soong and the role played through his life by the Methodist Mission and the Bull Durham Tobacco dynasty under the leadership of Julian Carr, who was one of the founders of Duke University.

The second point I wish to note is that the British Empire has given us a “precedent” in which a Western Civilization Empire of a “Christian bent” did indeed exercise as a matter of official “Foreign Policy” the international smuggling of a narcotic drug, and displayed a willingness under Lord Palmerston (PM of Great Britain) to use military force to protect its smuggling enterprises. The key word here is “precedent”. It was official policy and it incorporated the Bank of England's relations with the Throne, so that we see a combination of  financial and military forces working in tandem to effect and expedite governmental policy.


Now let's skip a few decades into the early 1900s, where we find some truly fascinating history right here in America. It has been said that it took the Anglo-American Eastern Establishment seventy-seven years to undo the damage done to their privately-held central banking exploits by Andrew Jackson.

At Jekyll Island, Georgia, in 1910, seven men met in secrecy to construct a banking bill which would effectively create a banking cartel. Let's look for a moment at the origins of the Federal Reserve System, Incorporated, which is a privately-held central bank cartel consisting of 12 member banks doing business with the U.S. Federal government.


“The eyes of our citizens are not sufficiently open to the true cause of our distress. They ascribe them to everything but their true cause, the banking system; a system which if it could do good in any form is yet so certain of leading to abuse as to be utterly incompatible with the public safety and prosperity. The Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution.”  - Third president of the USA, Thomas Jefferson  (1743 – 1826)
“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.”  - 4th president of the USA James Madison. (1751 - 1836)
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." Thomas Jefferson:  Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802) and later published in The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill (1809)


The biggest curiosity about what happened at Jekyll Island, Georgia, in 1910 is that hardly anyone is talking about it. If it is mentioned at all in the government schools, it is only noted in passing, and in a manner which does not tend to excite the students' curiosity about it. What did happen there in 1910 was a secret meeting at which seven men drew up a plan to create something which Frank Vanderlip later declared publicly was to be a “banking bill” for the U.S. Congress.
The seven  men met there in total secrecy. They went so far as to disguise themselves as a party of “duck hunters” - a ruse which would not inspire too much scrutiny at Jekyll Island, for duck hunting parties of wealthy men were not unusual there in the early 1900s. The seven men also held fast to a “rule” which forbade them from using their last names while travelling there and while working together there. Here is what Frank Vanderlip declared about it:

In the February 9, 1935, issue of the Saturday Evening Post, Frank Vanderlip wrote the following:

“Despite my views about the value to society of greater publicity for the affairs of corporations, there was an occasion, near the close of 1910, when I was as secretive – indeed, as furtive – as any conspirator. I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System.

“We were told to leave our last names behind us. We were told further that we should avoid dining together on the night of our departure. We were instructed to come one at a time and as unobtrusively as possible to the railroad terminal on the New Jersey littoral of the Hudson, where Senator Aldrich's private car would be in readiness, attached to the rear end of a train for the South. (snip)

“The servants and train crew may have known the identities of one or two of us, but they did not know all, and it was the names of all printed together that would have made ourmysterious journey significant in Washington, in Wall Street, even in London. Discovery, we knew, simply must not happen, or else all our time and effort would be wasted. If it were to be exposed publicly that our particular group had got together and written a banking bill, that bill would have no chance whatever of passage by Congress.” (1; page 11)

The seven men went to Jekyll Island to draw up a banking bill, and they knew to keep their mission “secret”.
The seven men were:

1.Nelson  W. Aldrich, Republican 'whip' in the Senate, Chairman of the National Monetary Commissionm father-in-law to John D. Rockefeller.

2.Henry P. Davison, Senior Partner of J.P. Morgan Company.

3.Charles D. Norton, President of 1st National Bank of New York.

4.A. Piatt Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the United States Treasury.

5.Frank A. Vanderlip, President of the National City Bank of New York, representing William Rockefeller.

6.Benjamin Strong, head of J.P. Morgan's Bankers Trust Company, later to become head of the Federal Reserve System.

7.Paul Moritz Warburg, a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Company, representing the Rothschilds and Warburgs in Europe.

These seven men created the bill at Jekyll Island, Georgia in 1910. They named the bill “The Aldrich Bill”, and under that name the bill failed to pass Congress.  They re-wrote parts of the Aldrich bill and re-named it the “Federal Reserve Bill”, and, under some very curious circumstances that version of the bill passed the U.S. Senate on the morning of December 23, 1913. (2)

So the Federal Reserve Act gave Congressional legitimacy to a bill designed by representatives of four “Houses” of international banking families: The House of Warburg of Germany and Holland; the House of Rothschild in England and other European countries; the House of  Rockefeller in America; and the House of J.P. Morgan in America.  I sometimes refer to the Federal Reserve by its full name, the Federal Reserve System, Incorporated.  I do so to give people note that the Federal Reserve is a privately-held network of banks, and that the Fed is not a part of our Federal government Not only is the Federal Reserve not a part of our Federal government (which means that there is nothing “Federal” about the corporation); it also has “questionable” reserves and is privately owned by someone, and the owners are not disclosed to the public. In other words, the owners of the Federal Reserve System, Inc., are unknown, to our “representative government”.

That fact is enhanced in our amazement once we discover that the Fed has never been audited. No one knows the inner workings of the Federal Reserve System, Inc., and it is doubtful that anyone shall. I would submit to you that this situation is the absolute and unchallenged apex of secret power. The reason I would say that is because the Fed has more direct power over American citizens than does the Federal Government itself. The Fed determines interest rates, manipulates inflation, and thereby determines what your house note and your car note shall be, and whether or not you'll even have a job (in most cases involving 'employment'). That is pretty powerful.

Also displaying a staggering if secret power is the fact that some of the Fed's creators are in Europe instead of America. And let us never forget that the Fed is a “central bank”.  As a central bank, the bank is in charge of issuing the currency under our nation's monetary policy. As a central bank, the Fed also is allowed to buy our government's debt. Perhaps that is among the chief reasons Americans should regard the Federal Reserve System, Inc., with keen and suspicious eyes, as we shall come to see. It has been said, “The hand that lends is above the hand that borrows.” (3)

But the powerful face of secrecy grows even more grotesque once we discover that the Federal Reserve System, Inc., owns controlling interest in the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (World Bank/IMF). And you and I must content ourselves knowing such facts about the Fed without ever having the privilege of knowing who owns it.

But now we know who created it. We also know that the Fed's two chief predecessors were the “Bank of North America” and the “1rst National Bank of America”, both privately-held fractional-reserve central banks.



1) “The Creature From Jekyll Island: A Second Look At The Federal Reserve”, by  G. Edward Griffin; copyright 1994, 1995, 1998 by G. Edward Griffin; Published by American Media, P.O. Box 4646, Westlake Village, California, 91359-1646.
2) On that morning, December 23, 1913, while most of Congress had gone home for the Christmas holidays,  three U.S. Senators went to the floor of the Senate and held a voice vote on the Federal Reserve Bill and passed it by a vote of three “for” and zero voting  “against”.  That is 3 to nothing, with no one present to call for a quorum or object to a three-man vote on a major banking cartel's bill. A Senate curiosity.
3)attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte, from a paraphrase of a Biblical statement.


In 1913 Americans also fell heir to something called the IRS and the Federal Income Tax, which is fully backed by the authority of the U.S. Government. Like the Federal Reserve System, Inc., the IRS is with us to this day. And like the Federal Reserve, the IRS is stingy with answers for Americans wishing for redress of their grievances. The President at that time was Woodrow Wilson. Mr. Wilson had a friend named Colonel Edward Mandell House, who served as an advisor. Colonel House was one of the founders of the Council on Foreign Relations.

For the CFR's history in their own words, a wonderful book by one Mr. Peter Grosse  is online here for free downloading:

Mr. Grosse has also released a book entitled: “Gentleman Spy: The Life of Allen Dulles.”

We note that John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles' brother, was published in the CFR's first publication of its quarterly journal, “Foreign Affairs”.

In the chapter entitled “The Inquiry” the first picture we see is an antique black and white photo of President Woodrow Wilson and Colonel Edward Mandall House. Near the beginning of that chapter we also find this passage: “What began as an intellectual response to a juncture of history grew into an institution that would thrive through all the diplomacy of America's twentieth century.”

The “juncture of history” alluded to there was what we now call World War I. At the end of WWI, an international effort was made to establish a “League of Nations”. From that effort came the Royal Institute of International Affairs and its American cousin-organization, the Council on Foreign Relations. The Dulles brothers were involved very early in the history of the CFR.


Skipping some very interesting interim events for the sake of brevity here, let us now look at the buildup across the 1930s of Adolph Hitler's Nazi Party which produced World War II.

The first thing I would like to note with you is that “On Oct. 20, 1942, the U.S. government ordered the seizure of Nazi German banking operations in New York City which were being conducted by Prescott Bush. That would be our current President's grandfather, who had married the daughter of George Herbert Walker, who himself was a partner with E. Roland and Averell Harriman, owners of Harriman Brothers Inc. on Wall Street. By marrying into George Herbert Walker's family, Prescott Bush was brought into management at Harriman Brothers, which subsequently created a bank named Union Banking Corporation and put Prescott Bush atop that bank's management.

Under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the government took over the Union Banking Corporation, in which Bush was a director. The U.S. Alien Property Custodian seized Union Banking Corp.'s stock shares, all of which were owned by Prescott Bush, E. Roland `` Bunny '' Harriman, three Nazi executives, and two other associates of Bush. The vesting order states that Prescott Bush was “director of UBC, which was co-founded and sponsored by his father-in-law George Walker; senior managing partner for E. Roland Harriman and Averell Harriman.”

Exactly why the government seized Union Banking Corporation under the Trading With The Enemy Act had to do with UBC's and the Harriman Brothers Corporation's assistance in the buildup of Hitler's Nazi infrastructure in Germany. For example, one German-American business which operated under the umbrella of Bush's Union Banking Corporation was Hamburg-America Steamship Line, and that business was involved in money-transfers which directly traced to the financing of Hitler's Brown Shirts. But additionally, many other businesses were managed through Union Banking Corporation. From Chaitkin and Tarpley we learn: “By Oct. 26, 1942, U.S. troops were under way for North Africa. On Oct. 28, the government issued orders seizing two Nazi front organizations run by the Bush-Harriman bank: the Holland-American Trading Corporation and the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation. U.S. forces landed under fire near Algiers on Nov. 8, 1942; heavy combat raged throughout November. Nazi interests in the Silesian-American Corporation, long managed by Prescott Bush and his father-in-law George Herbert Walker, were seized under the Trading with the Enemy Act on Nov. 17, 1942.”
Although there is much rich history available on this general topic, I wish to only note a few brief facts this morning. One fact is that the Carnegie Foundation For International Peace is now known to have financed Hitler's eugenics program across the 1930s and all the way through World War II, and the Ford Motor Company ran factories in Germany throughout the 1930s and into the opening years of WWII, and that Standard Oil of New Jersey (a Rockefeller corporation) shared patents with Hitler's I.G. Farben corporation. In fact, many American businesses were involved in Hitler's buildup across the 1930s, and guess who were the two prominent lawyers who did the legal interfacing of international law to keep those arrangements intact and profitable.... you're right – it was the two shining stars of Sullivan and Cromwell on Wall Street, Allen Dulles and his brother John Foster Dulles.

What that shows us is the undebatable fact that Allen Dulles was a Wall Street lawyer who ran the international legal liaison between Hitler and Wall Street as Hitler was coming to power. Here is a brief listing of some of Allen Dulles' handiwork, courtesy, again, of Chaitkin and Tarpley:

“The 1942 U.S. government investigative report said that Bush's Nazi-front bank was an interlocking concern with the Vereinigte Stahlwerke (United Steel Works Corporation or German Steel Trust) led by Fritz Thyssen and his two brothers. After the war, Congressional investigators probed the Thyssen interests, Union Banking Corp. and related Nazi units. The investigation showed that the Vereinigte Stahlwerke had produced the following approximate proportions of total German national output:

50.8% of Nazi Germany's pig iron
41.4% of Nazi Germany's universal plate
36.0% of Nazi Germany's heavy plate
38.5% of Nazi Germany's galvanized sheet
45.5% of Nazi Germany's pipes and tubes
22.1% of Nazi Germany's wire
35.0% of Nazi Germany's explosives.”

For that we can thank Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles, with, of course, the help of other Wall Street firms, such as Dillon, Read, Incorporated. So U.S. Soldiers were sent into battle in WWII against a Third Reich which had been largely engineered financially and logistically and industrially with the help of Allen Dulles. This is now known history. But let us move along here.

Thus far, we've seen that Heatley Dulles was from Charleston, South Carolina and had been in the slave business through contacts with the British East India Company, and that he had rooted himself in the Anglo-American Establishment at Yale University, and that his heirs included Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles.

Then we learned that Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles were involved early with the Council on Foreign Relations.
Now we've learned that Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles were Wall Street lawyers at Sullivan and Cromwell who assisted the Harriman Brothers Corporation and Prescott Bush's Union Banking Corportation in bringing Hitler to power in the 1930s.
But now it's going to get interesting. Allen Dulles managed to remain out of jail despite his work for Hitler and Prescott Bush and the Harriman brothers, and at the end of World War II he had a bright idea. He, (and John Foster Dulles), went to a man named Clark Clifford to cook up some new business in the wake of the disastrous loss by Hitler of WWII.

With Clark Clifford, who was a long-time aide to then-President Harry Truman, Allen Dulles helped write the “National Security Act of 1947”, which Truman signed into law. That Act created the CIA, the NSC, and something which most Americans have never heard of – the “Black Budget”. The effect of the National Security Act of 1947, at bottom line from my perspective, was to give the Federal government of the USA the “legal right” to lie to the American public. Almost from the moment the CIA was birthed by that Act, things in America started going haywire, and they seem to have spiraled downwardly into the sordid conditions in which we find ourselves today.

One of the earliest acts of amazement which the CIA did was to go over to the Nuremberg War Crimes trials and rescue several hundred Nazi war criminals and bring them into the United States where they were hidden inside the CIA. That information is available by Googling “CIA, Operation Paperclip”. CIA also salvaged some German scientists and placed them into America's scientific community.

So we find that as Allen Dulles had helped Hitler come to power, he subsequently assisted in saving some hundreds of Nazi war criminals after Hitler's defeat in WWII.

The next peak event in Allen Dulles' life was to rise to the top position at the very CIA which he helped create. He became DCI (Director of Central Intelligence) under Dwight D. Eisenhower, which is where he chanced to be when John F. Kennedy came to office. As we learn from Bob Woodward in his book, “Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA, 1981-1987”, the DCI of the departing Administration is tasked with the job of explaining the covert operations which overlap Administrations, and so it was that Allen Dulles had to explain to Kennedy about Eisenhower's plan to invade Cuba with a secret CIA army of mercenaries. Another Skull and Bonesman from CIA was with Allen Dulles when he briefed Kennedy about the plan, one Richard Bissell, the number 3 man at CIA.

As they explained the plan to Kennedy, Kennedy asked about air support for their planned invasion of Cuba. Dulles and Bissell lied to Kennedy and told him they would use airplanes from a Central American country, which Kennedy approved. Kennedy reportedly told Bissell and Allen Dulles at that time that in no way could he afford to use U.S. Military aircraft, as this was to be a clandestine operation with which the U.S. Government could not be overtly involved. After all, it was highly illegal. The plan which Allen Dulles and Richard Bissell held close to their vests was to simply not worry about obtaining foreign aircraft, and then, at the last moment, call Kennedy with an urgent request for air cover using American military aircraft. That is what they did, so that on the Sunday morning of the Bay of Pigs fiasco they called Kennedy, woke him up at the White House, and demanded that he furnish some emergency relief for the landing of the troops, which was at that time underway and could not be recalled.

Kennedy balked, telling Allen Dulles that there was no way he was going to allow the U.S. Government to be associated with the illegal invasion. The Bay of Pigs failed miserably as a result, and the CIA couldn't cover Kennedy with “plausible deniability”, so Kennedy got caught publicly in a massive lie. For that, he held an investigation, which was for show only, since he had approved the invasion secretly with a “Finding” at Dulles' request at the initial briefing. But in the wake of that investigation, Kennedy fired the top three men at CIA, including Allen Dulles, who was one of the men who had created the CIA.

Not long afterward, Kennedy was assassinated in an event which has stirred deep controversy ever since. The oddity which stands out in my mind the most, however, is the simple fact that Allen Dulles was appointed by Lyndon B. Johnson to sit on the Warren Commission to investigate the murder of Kennedy.

For some reason, the Warren Commission decided to seal its investigation for one hundred years.


Those are the high points in the career of Allen Dulles, a practitioner of “Statecraft”. As we now see, “statecraft” can be an untidy business once official secrecy is established within a state's administration of its authority. Since 1947, transparency in American governance at the Federal level has been a thing of the past, if indeed it ever existed. My premise is that American government has great need for a return to transparency. And here is why I say that now...

First, let us recall that Dick Cheney is one of the founders of the Project For A New American Century, which is the private think-tank which wrote a letter, for the record, to President Clinton in the year 2000 calling for military intervention in Iraq, and which stated that the goals for American predominance in the 21st Century would benefit by some major new event like a “new Pearl Harbor”. That letter is on the PNAC's website in pdf format.

An oddity associated with that is the fact that just prior to the PNAC's letter to Clinton, Zbigniew Brzezinski published, in 1998, his infamous book, “The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geopolitical Imperatives”, in which he called for military control over the Caspian Sea area of Eurasia, which is where he felt more than seventy percent of the world's remaining energy resources would be found. On page 211 of that book Brzezinski states this ominous template which the PNAC bought hook line and sinker:

“Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.” ~  Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1998.

Mr. Brzezinski is a co-founder with David Rockefeller of the Trilateral Commission, a major player at the CFR, and a known Bilderberger attendee. He was Jimmy Carter's “National Security Advisor” in 1979 when he and Carter decided to put the CIA into Kabul, Afghanistan to destabilize it and draw thereby the Russian (Soviet) military into Afghanistan, a fact which happened six months after the CIA was injected there. It was from that point that the CIA went to Osama bin Laden's father and contracted  with him to build the guerrilla training camps which were used to train Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda, and which Clinton later nuked with Monica missiles. To Brzezniski's credit, that “chess move” in 1979 ultimately led to the dissipation of the Soviet economy and the subsequent fall of the USSR – but, it also empowered Islamic Jihad in the character of al Qaeda, and gave Osama bin Laden years of experience as a CIA asset. The currently popular term comes to mind – “Unintended Consequences”.

Of course, the American people were left out of the loop on most of this. Removing transparency was helpful for the silent powers behind the face of governance, but it was not so good for the average American taxpayer.

Now let's consider something which is horrible, but which can show us a grotesque portrait of berserk “statecraft” in action.

We have a sitting Vice President, Mr. Richard Cheney, former Director at the CFR and co-founder of the PNAC, who on May 08, 2001, was, by virtue of a White House press release signed by President Bush, (who we must remember is the grandson of one of Hitler's biggest bankers), which states that Dick Cheney was at that time to be in charge of “consequence management exercises” involving the Secret Service, the Pentagon, the CIA, FEMA, and other governmental agencies which might be involved in any “terrorist” attacks on U.S. Soil.

Something which the Vice President has not said one peep about since May 08, 2001, is the fact that on the morning of 911 he was running over the east coast of the United States of America five wargame “drills”, using a command and control and communications Secret Service bunker equipped with a mutated version of PROMISS software which had the real-time capability of overriding the FAA, NORAD, Pentagon, Air Force, FEMA, CIA, and other Federal and state agencies (such as the Port Authority of New York/New Jersey) communications systems.

One of those five wargame “drills” involved the use of “live-fly” U.S. Military aircraft being flown without pilots over the skies of New York and Washington, whose flights were controlled from command and control and communications bunkers on the ground.

Another of those five wargame drills involved injecting “fake hijack blips” onto the radar screens of the FAA and NORAD, so that at one point during the morning hours of 911 the FAA and NORAD were seeing as many as twenty-two “hijackings” in progress. There were less than fourteen aircraft available to scramble to intercept those 22 hijackings.

And yet another one of the five wargame drills had pulled most of the military's jet fighter planes from the east coast and sent them to Alaska and northern Canada prior to the morning hours of 911.

Keeping that in mind, let us now look at some anomalies brought to our attention by Dave Von Kleist of the Missouri-based radio show, “The Power Hour”.

First, George Walker Bush has said publicly, on two different occasions, both of which we have on film, that he saw the first airplane hit the North tower of the WTC on the morning of 911, *before he went into that classroom in Florida. The problem with that is that that film was not shown on anyone's tv that morning, and was in fact not shown at all until September 12th, the following day. When we first heard him say this, which I repeat he did say before cameras on two different occasions, we realized that G.W. Bush had admitted to something which was impossible. Now, however, we know that he of course did see that first plane hit the tower, in real time, on the CIA's secret communications system, with which Bush was equipped in Florida. He received the transmission in real time from Dick Cheney's command and control and communications bunker.

What is going to catch the guilty parties who planned and executed the attacks of 911, however, is the curious anomalies surrounding the collapse at approximately 5:30 p.m. on the afternoon of 911, of WTC-7. Both the NIST and FEMA are already on record lying about this, and they've been caught. Let's wrap things up with this film clip:


Note - I used four film clips, interspersed in the presentation, one being from the film in question, by Jimmy Walter. After speaking, I fielded questions from the class for about twenty minutes. Dr. Schrupp was a wonderful host. I've been invited back to do this again for a larger class later this year.

Ragnar, to cap off this odd posting, I'll note for you that this evening, with only one interruption by my danged cat, I did "Everything You Know Is Wrong" by Firesign Theater. LOL!  They're right! I'm wrong! :)



"Heirs to self-knowledge shed gently their fears..."

Elias Alias

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4918
  • TMM
Free Movie!
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2005, 04:06:13 am »

I can't say I put much stock in the theory that the Feds planned and executed 9/11, but I'll download the movie segments and take a look.
Hey, Ian, thanks for keeping an open mind. The good thing about that offer above is that it's not a download, per se, but instead is an invitation to receive in the mail a free CD or DVD of the production.

Of course, if TMM had the facilities, I do believe I could make an even more-convincing CD on the subject. I'm presently pursuing the very illusive and evasive software which will let me edit film clips and compose them into one CD or DVD, which I think shall prove to be much fun.

Haven't talked with you in a while - how's school going? You ever gonna make it back out this way? It would be nice to visit again.

"Heirs to self-knowledge shed gently their fears..."
Pages: [1]   Go Up