the terrorist who trained the London bombers was a US informant and has been freed after serving only four and a half years of a possible 70-year sentence. ... <snip>...
That alone lets the whole article down. We should be
absolutely certain that there was no "terrorist who trained the London bombers", as the only "London bombers" were government agents (what government, I'm not sure, but it is pretty clear that the UK government was involved in a huge way). The blamed "London bombers" were the real patsies.
I like "infowars" articles and largely they do tell the truth, although they do put a provocative slant on it, but this is why so many people dismiss "infowars" "out of hand" - there are too many inconsistencies. First they will have an article (written by an "infowars" journalist) about 9.11 truth, or 7.7 truth (or any number of things really) and then they will have another article (usually written by the same person) talking about "the terrorists" involved with those things. Sheesh! "Make up your mind"!
