"There are no good cops. There are no good soldiers. They exist only in propaganda films and fantasies. Both occupations are inherently evil. ( omitted ) Both turn well-intentioned fools into psychopaths."
Silver, is this what you really believe?
I left out the attract thugs and bullies part because that is unarguably true.
I submit that the entire paragraph is unarguably true.
Freedomista
Maggie McNeill addressed this a few years back:
If a cop is tasked with enforcing a law he knows to be immoral, it is his duty as a moral man to refuse that order even if it means his job. If he agrees with an immoral law then he is also immoral, and if he enforces a law he knows to be wrong even more so. The law of the land in Nazi-era Germany was for Jews and other “undesirables” to be sent to concentration camps, and the maltreatment of the prisoners was encouraged and even ordered by those in charge; any German soldier or policeman enforcing those laws was the exact moral equivalent of any soldier or policeman under any other democratically-elected government enforcing the laws enacted by that regime. Either “I was only following orders” is a valid defense, or it isn’t; either we agree that hired enforcers are absolved from responsibility because “they’re just doing their jobs”, or we don’t. You can’t have it both ways, and sometimes Nazi analogies are entirely appropriate.
I am not appealing to authority here, but pointing out that thoughtful people have been reaching the same conclusion for centuries. Read
Erasmus on the Wickedness of Soldiers by Lawence Vance. Read Erasmus directly if you dare, it is powerful stuff.
Erasmus wrote a full 300 years before the invention of police, that clever ruse whereby an occupation army is imposed upon citizen-subjects by calling it something else. So while he confined himself to writing about soldiers, every word applies to police as well.
Let me amplify on McNeill's point: Those German soldiers and policemen were subject to immediate, severe punishment, up to summary execution, if they did not obey orders. But at Nuremberg we hung them anyway. We rejected "just following orders" as a legitimate excuse for immoral acts.
The source of the paycheck does not change the morality of the employee's actions.
Now if ordinary German citizens, in addition to police and soldiers, could be caged, beaten, and killed
for refusing a salute, what possible excuse does any US thug have for their actions? Their risks are primarily economic, such as losing an over-paid low-skill job with a luxurious pension.
Unless of course they are an actual oath keeper, meaning that they take their oath to the Constitution seriously, and act to uphold it.
Like Chelsea Manning, who has earned the right to be called whatever she wants. Because her objections to the many heinous war crimes of US soldiers against unarmed civilians were ignored, she acted. She kept her oath.
For that she was tortured for months, subjected to a show trial, and locked in a cage, where she remains.
That's what happens to soldiers and policemen who refuse to obey unconstitutional orders.
People with the courage and integrity of Chelsea Manning are extremely rare, and I don't hold the average thug to her standards. She could have simply resigned and rejoined peaceful civil society, and I for one would have accepted her decision and welcomed her.
As I would welcome all such people who renounce the use of violence to achieve their goals. I don't expect them to risk imprisonment, torture, and death in order to keep their oath to "a goddamned piece of paper." I don't require penance and restitution. All I ask is that they take off the silly costume and join the ranks of peaceful free men and women.
Peace,
Silver
PS - I realize that Chelsea Manning could be offered as an example of a good soldier. I have several responses, starting with the observation that the overwhelming majority of soldiers believe the opposite.
More importantly, since her sentence includes a forced dishonorable discharge, she remains a soldier only by the whim of her tormentors, not by her own choice. Once she is freed, she will no longer be a soldier. She proves my point - the only good soldiers are ex-soldiers.