This is an interesting thread, and has stirred up various things that have been simmering for a while under the surface in this corner of my mind. Read on and tell me if my cooking's any good...
I don't believe that when taken as a whole, the Bible puts women on a lower footing than men. Can it be twisted to put women down? Certainly. It can also be twisted and taken out of context any number of other ways.
We read from the Bible most days at our house, and I would consider my teaching and example to be a miserable failure if my daughter gets the impression that the female sex has any less worth or potential than the male. Unlike some Christians I know, I'm not into pulling verses out of their context as part of the whole Bible. I try to find the common threads that run through the whole Bible, and see the overriding message. What I gather from the book as a whole isn't about condemnation, damnation, oppression, hatred, or misogyny.*
For the record, I include my daughter, as much as she can stand it, in everything from auto repairs, to shooting, to gulch security planning. I think a gulching mindset is conducive to equality and mutual respect between the sexes, because without the fragile division of labor inherent in cities, men and women are forced to rely on each other more to accomplish everything necessary for survival, let alone prosperity.
While I don't deny that women have been unfairly and viciously put down by various "Christian" individuals and institutions throughout history, it is interesting to look around the world today and see which areas afford women the most freedom compared to men, both legally and culturally. By this I mean places where women are afforded equality before the law, and are actually free to assert it without eliciting threats to life and liberty. I'm thinking of the USA, Canada, Northern Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Israel. As opposed to Africa, the Muslim world, East Asia, or Latin America. With the exception of Israel, all of the former group have generally Protestant underpinnings. Is this just a coincidence? (Or, to be fair, could the unusually liberated state of women in these countries actually be due to pre-Christian religions?)
I admit that I'm painting with a broad brush here, and have glossed over Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, South Africa, and the matriarchal aspects of many African and east Asian cultures, as well as the way Catholicism has skewed the demographics.
I think Adam actually comes out worse than Eve in the Garden of Eden story. While Eve made a conscious choice to sin, Adam just followed her example without question, and then tried to dodge responsibility for his own actions later... by blaming it on Eve. So in a way, you could say he was both pussywhipped and a coward.
If the Gospels are to be believed, Jesus himself treated women - even "loose" women - as human beings and equals in a way that was shocking to his orthodox Jewish counterparts.
I just don't see the Bible as the fount of misogyny that some of you apparently do.
To be fair here, I should mention my wife, who is one of the sanest, funniest, and least hung-up individuals of either sex that I've had the privilege of knowing. She was not raised a Christian, but nominally Buddhist. Read into that what you will. She's not a bra-burner, but she seems freer in her head than I am, in terms of not caring what other people think, and being able to just ignore things that would stress and preoccupy me. (She converted to Christianity as an adult a few years before I met her. She says that a loving God was revolutionary to her, and something that her Buddhist education had neither hinted at nor really prepared her for.)
Note: The life and teachings of Jesus Christ stand head and shoulders above any other spiritual tradition I have encountered, but also I see much of value in the Tao te Ching, as well as the teachings of Buddha. However, I know about as many hypocritical Buddhists as I do hypocritical Christians, which is to say, a lot. I've seen Taoist temples in the East, but the Tao seems better embodied in anarchists I know than in religious people who burn incense before idols.
__________________________________________________________
*There are portions of the New Testament which seem to me to serve us better as history, to be learned from, rather than an exact model to be followed - I'm thinking specifically of the book of Acts and parts of the epistles. If I treat the Bible as a huge list of rules to be followed for fear of hellfire, it seems to contradict itself and generally confuse me. If I treat it as a contextual whole and look for the overriding themes, I see a book about love and redemption. It's a terrible shame to lose sight of the forest for the trees when you're trying to untangle the meaning of life.