Actually, I agree that this thread should be moved to the 9/11 sub-board, preferably in the "after 9/11" section. Any moderator reading here is invited to make that transfer.
Secondly, I'm more or less of the same mindset as Bill, who was kind enough to activate the links provided initially by Secret Six - I'm not likely to listen to these tapes at this time. Why am I not interested enough to listen to them at present moment? Several reasons, but the prime reason is that these tapes are not likely to reveal anything not already pieced together by observant and thoughtful skeptics of the official government story, which is, in my opinioin, the
real conspiracy theory.
Additionally, jai-mann's reflection, in which he questions the possibility that the tapes may have been edited or otherwise tampered with, renders this extremely belated release to be less than of instant interest.
Perhaps Khagler may be persuaded to define for us this remarkable term - "conspiratoid nutjobs". Personally, I'm interested in seeing a definition by Khagler of what a "conspiratoid nutjob" might be. I need to know the definition, so I won't accidentally, in my misplaced enthusiasm, morph into one - jeez, I'd hate to be a "conspiratoid nutjob"! And I would hate also to be one of those whilst not even
knowing that I was one! Ack! So a definition would be helpful....
For Anduril and jack, (and anyone else who may be interested, the science of the entire question of 9/11/2001 is being worked out very meticulously by some very fine minds at a place which is packed with scientists and scholars and thinkers and researchers. That place is called "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice", and they can be found here (among other places) -
http://www.stj911.org/A place where they post findings is here -
http://www.journalof911studies.com/A couple of samples from that page are here - (this first one is by Dr. Graeme MacQueen, whom I've met personally and with whom I at times exchange emails. This link is a pdf file, and is a good example of the level of objectivity maintained by the Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice... ) -
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200701/MacQueenWaitingforSeven.pdfThis article should be of interest to any reader, if for no other reason than to experience the combined thinking of so many Ph.D's and associates such as Kevin Ryan, the fellow who got fired from his job at Underwriters Laboratories (which had certified the steel used in the construction of the WTC towers), for daring to point out the flaws in the NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology) report - (this link also is a pdf file) -
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf... teaser from that link ....
Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destructionSteven E. Jones1, Jeffrey Farrer2, Gregory S. Jenkins3, Frank Legge4, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan,
Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe5.
1 S&J Scientific Co., Provo, Utah (EA note: Dr. Steven Jones was formerly a tenured professor of physics at Brigham Young Univ.)
2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
3 Physics Department, University of Maryland at College Park, Maryland
4 Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia
5 Department of Physics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
AbstractIn an effort to better understand the conditions that led to complete collapses of the World Trade Center
Towers and WTC 7, we apply scanning-electron-microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray
spectroscopy (XEDS) methods to analyze the dust generated, with an emphasis on observed micro-spheres
in the WTC dust. The formation of molten spheres with high iron contents along with other species in the
WTC dust required extremely high temperatures. Our results are compared with those of other laboratories.
The temperatures required for the molten sphere-formation and evaporation of materials as observed in the
WTC dust are significantly higher than temperatures associated with the burning of jet fuel and office
materials in the WTC buildings.~
In closing this post, I would like to ask a three-fold question. What on earth was Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network doing with the same software program that was used by the U.S. Secret Service and CIA? - and - How did al Qaeda come to own and use "real time" software (PROMIS / PTech) that was suitable for the U.S. Intelligence community and which was being used by the Secret Service and the CIA on the morning of 9/11 to inject the fake hijack blips (inserts) onto the radar screens of the FAA and NORAD? - and - Does the U.S. Intelligence community conduct "black operations", or not?
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/012005_ptech_pt1.shtmlSalute!
Elias
