The Mental Militia Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Check out and contribute to our new Wolfekipedia:
http://thementalmilitia.com/wiki/
or
https://thementalmilitia.com/wiki/

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: The Rothbard/Rand split path  (Read 890 times)

Mountain Prepper

  • Observation, logic, communication, and acceptance is the only rational path.
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1263
  • Crafty Mountain Coyote
    • Rocky Mountain Preparedness
The Rothbard/Rand split path
« on: January 08, 2012, 05:40:58 PM »

Quote
The major lesson of the history of the [objectivist] movement to libertarians is that It Can Happen Here, that libertarians, despite explicit devotion to reason and individuality, are not exempt from the mystical and totalitarian cultism that pervades other ideological as well as religious movements. Hopefully, libertarians, once bitten by the virus, may now prove immune. - Rothbard

Where do you all stand on this and other splits in ideology?

One I have seen even here is my rejection of Rand’s outdated view of “altruism” particularly in light of modern genetic and biological evidence.
Logged
http://mountainpreparedness.blogspot.com

The majority of the populace remains willfully and blissfully ignorant of the fact that they are simply trained monkeys owned by the oligarchy. The act of voting is only another delusion to distract, similar to sports, controlled media manipulation, and religion. Nothing is ever fixed because normal is both mediocre and cowardly.

Mountain Prepper

  • Observation, logic, communication, and acceptance is the only rational path.
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1263
  • Crafty Mountain Coyote
    • Rocky Mountain Preparedness
Re: The Rothbard/Rand split path
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2012, 05:52:59 PM »

Rand on libertarians:

Quote
"They are not defenders of capitalism... I've read nothing by a Libertarian (when I read them, in the early years) that wasn't my ideas badly mishandled—i.e., had the teeth pulled out of them—with no credit given."

Funny, what I would expect from a narcissist, one who was unable to (or more likely unwilling to) point out where her own influences originated from. (like Isabel Paterson)
Logged
http://mountainpreparedness.blogspot.com

The majority of the populace remains willfully and blissfully ignorant of the fact that they are simply trained monkeys owned by the oligarchy. The act of voting is only another delusion to distract, similar to sports, controlled media manipulation, and religion. Nothing is ever fixed because normal is both mediocre and cowardly.

ZooT_aLLures

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7850
    • http://www.thepriceofliberty.org
Re: The Rothbard/Rand split path
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2012, 07:49:10 PM »

Well, from my experiences I've determined that "homo sapien" and "human being" are not mutually inclusive, and that while all human beings are homo sapiens not all homo sapiens are human beings.
Logged
Even some cowboy and indian outlaws in the 1800's eventually stopped sleeping under buffalo skins, and came to town to entertain paying customers. For some I imagine the bruising of their ego never healed.

We all have some scar tissue that never lets us completely forget the intent of the adventure.

Mountain Prepper

  • Observation, logic, communication, and acceptance is the only rational path.
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1263
  • Crafty Mountain Coyote
    • Rocky Mountain Preparedness
Re: The Rothbard/Rand split path
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2012, 09:11:46 PM »

Well, from my experiences I've determined that "homo sapien" and "human being" are not mutually inclusive, and that while all human beings are homo sapiens not all homo sapiens are human beings.


So is that to say that only objectivists or libertarians or some others are humans...  ^_^
Logged
http://mountainpreparedness.blogspot.com

The majority of the populace remains willfully and blissfully ignorant of the fact that they are simply trained monkeys owned by the oligarchy. The act of voting is only another delusion to distract, similar to sports, controlled media manipulation, and religion. Nothing is ever fixed because normal is both mediocre and cowardly.

ZooT_aLLures

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7850
    • http://www.thepriceofliberty.org
Re: The Rothbard/Rand split path
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2012, 11:14:23 PM »

Quote
So is that to say that only objectivists or libertarians or some others are humans... 

No, it's not to say that in any way shape or form........what you chose to call yourself has nothing to do with it...............those are just words...........your actions determine what you are

Logged
Even some cowboy and indian outlaws in the 1800's eventually stopped sleeping under buffalo skins, and came to town to entertain paying customers. For some I imagine the bruising of their ego never healed.

We all have some scar tissue that never lets us completely forget the intent of the adventure.

Mountain Prepper

  • Observation, logic, communication, and acceptance is the only rational path.
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1263
  • Crafty Mountain Coyote
    • Rocky Mountain Preparedness
Re: The Rothbard/Rand split path
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2012, 02:48:46 AM »

Quote
So is that to say that only objectivists or libertarians or some others are humans... 

No, it's not to say that in any way shape or form........what you chose to call yourself has nothing to do with it...............those are just words...........your actions determine what you are


So Rand was a cult leader, and a narcissistic, racist, delusional?

What if we throw the liar and disinformation expert Noam Chomsky into the mix?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIpJQEcXP7A
Logged
http://mountainpreparedness.blogspot.com

The majority of the populace remains willfully and blissfully ignorant of the fact that they are simply trained monkeys owned by the oligarchy. The act of voting is only another delusion to distract, similar to sports, controlled media manipulation, and religion. Nothing is ever fixed because normal is both mediocre and cowardly.

socalserf

  • Blue collar knucklehead
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2543
  • Riflemen are made not born.
Re: The Rothbard/Rand split path
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2012, 03:12:05 AM »

Quote
So is that to say that only objectivists or libertarians or some others are humans... 

No, it's not to say that in any way shape or form........what you chose to call yourself has nothing to do with it...............those are just words...........your actions determine what you are


So Rand was a cult leader, and a narcissistic, racist, delusional?Yes! But, she also had a negative side.

What if we throw the liar and disinformation expert Noam Chomsky into the mix?I'll take a pass on Chumpski.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIpJQEcXP7A
Logged
"Freedom's the answer. What's the question?"
~Author unknown to me

0point

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 171
Re: The Rothbard/Rand split path
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2012, 12:38:49 AM »

Quote
The major lesson of the history of the [objectivist] movement to libertarians is that It Can Happen Here, that libertarians, despite explicit devotion to reason and individuality, are not exempt from the mystical and totalitarian cultism that pervades other ideological as well as religious movements. Hopefully, libertarians, once bitten by the virus, may now prove immune. - Rothbard

Where do you all stand on this and other splits in ideology?

One I have seen even here is my rejection of Rand’s outdated view of “altruism” particularly in light of modern genetic and biological evidence.

I will be forever grateful to Ayn Rand, her writings were a huge push to get me started down my path 10+ years ago.  However, I soon realized she didn't follow her own advice:  "Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think that you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong."

Yet for whatever reason she couldn't follow her own arguments to their logical conclusion, which is that government is evil and immoral by its definition, by its very existence.

Perhaps she was so busy picking the specks of sawdust out of her followers' eyes, she couldn't see the plank in her own eye.

0
Logged
"Anarchism is founded on the observation that since few men are wise enough to rule themselves, even fewer are wise enough to rule others."

"The tragedy of modern war is that the young men die fighting each other - instead of their real enemies back home in the capitals."
- Edward Abbey
Pages: [1]   Go Up